The Question:
Why do Christians contend that Jesus is the only way to truth? There are so many religions in the world with historical figureheads. My conclusion is to remain neutral on choosing one over the other.
The Answer:
Christians contend Jesus is the only way to the truth for the same reason most other religions make the same claim for their idols: if it isn’t the only way to the truth, there isn’t any reason to be a Christian.
There’s a lot of money, power, and status riding on the question. Religious leaders may or may not believe in God, but a great many of them most assuredly believe in money, power, and status. It beats making an honest living by a mile.
Being neutral to all religions but finding them all to be potential repositories of truth is not very different from believing any one of them, and certainly no better; what does it require of you in terms of living a moral or ethical life, to be undecided or neutral? Perhaps you have your own moral code and beliefs, and perhaps they are merely convenient excuses allowing you to do whatever you like, or perhaps the principles you live are rigorous and challenging in light of life’s perennial temptations and confusions, but whatever the case may be, if you are deciding the meaning of the universe, life, and everything by cobbling together bits and pieces of every religion on your own, why bother with even a casual assumption of a multi-faceted but hazy god structure to support it? Most religions will condemn you out of hand, for not believing their particular version, whereas you will find few friends among atheists like myself will reject your vision because it appears on the surface to be nothing more than a religion of convenience but still a religion, carrying all the harm of religions in general by supporting the notion that there is something out there we owe fealty or allegiance to even if we can’t pin it down exactly, while doing nothing to advance the truth that we are, in fact, responsible for all of our ideas about what matters and what doesn’t ourselves. We are the agents, and the authority, and we need to address this honestly rather than by hiding behind old religions or by creating new ones either out of whole cloth or by pulling out and combining ideas from religions that already exist.
To sum up, it’s bad to suspend judgement on the idea that all or most religions might be on to something. It’s bad to justify the existence religion by making up another one. You need to pick a team. There either is a god, or there isn’t. Agnosticism is the only position of the three main positions concerning religion that has no chance of being right. Or, as a minister friend of mine used to say many years ago, shit or get off the pot.
This new age stuff is appallingly fuzzy-headed; I respect religious people who follow one brand of nonsense more than I respect purveyors of blended nonsense from multiple sources (Not much more, but some. They at least have to have some discipline and do things they don’t want to do, if they actually follow their faith.) You can tolerate. You don’t have to succumb to religious thinking. Break free all the way.